Atlanta Horse Jump Makers

Causa Guttenberg second Scientific misconduct is often put in the system. The

I naturally talk.
As for the handling of footnotes and source documents, we have scholars - often reviled as much - the natural sciences and disciplines such as economics, law or engineering well ahead. As I was able to publish

then my master's thesis in a reputable journal, I told them to brag to a friend. The friend, a biologist, said:
"How - under your own name?"
Clash of cultures in which case: professional cultures. Apparently, it was explained to me, were separate publications for biologists before a promotion would not be possible. It worked for Diss in a Research group. The research group is headed by a post-doc or Prof. Since this obviously gives instructions, what you have to explore (who else?), May not research input so by the graduate student, ergo his name is not on the paper, when, then a maximum as a co-author. (On the widely used system of honorary authorship I would not talk at all ...) So I was
the then explained.
For me it smelled - apparently common - practice for plagiarism.
may perhaps, young scientists in the humanities, but in fact much more independent much earlier?
Or perhaps our entire study (my experience and background is of course the old master's degree) from the beginning to create an independent research?

We must in fact write during their studies homework. Leave the house and get to work is that, from the first semester.
who crammed all his studies, however only exam is knowledge, not research-based work and research-based publishing really prepared. Accordingly, then major problems arise in the final examinations, which consist almost everywhere from such self-researched work: Diploma Thesis, Bachelor - is everywhere suddenly all this provided was so or not an engineer or BWLer while studying hard has practiced.

the auditors remain two possibilities:

a) they lower the standards of compliance with general Zitiergewohnheiten - most engineers and lawyers go BWLer indeed not in the research do not work academically

b) they change their audit procedures such that even in these mass courses students basic knowledge of scientific work can be taught, that is to be replaced at least some of the standardized exams through intensive homework correction.

c) changing the final exam, so that (on Bachelor level) exams are written - and the students practiced in the form of examination to be examined.

My suspicion is that a) was more common.


My concern is, unfortunately, that teachers who have learned at university is not even true (even among engineers, an origin from the "practice" even considered a seal of approval) to convey can not ordinary Quote .
This concern is also the way my experience with humanities teachers of all possible field of study who have internalized the basics so that they can not remember how difficult it was.
This is indeed difficult. And
exhausting.
needs and time that could be more exciting, substantive, technical use discussions.

But what use is climbing technical peaks, when the seminar participants did not all understand why they have the Sherpas of recognized authorities there, and how they use the ropes and carabiners scientific citation? Of course you can go without them on the summit of knowledge. But is rare. And dangerous. And you can crash.
quod Google Yahoo.